data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4eae9/4eae9f38ca8e7e42f5543905f17119b897a92fab" alt="valheart :valheart:"
Am so glad our Raptor cam is back up! Just LOVE my sweet rth's...Was so glad to see Bob had posted an update on K2, and am soooo happy he is being used as an educational hawk instead of having been euthanized.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4583d/4583d0ac33dfa5767de23c9b5e16f6c5860c654a" alt="Image"
Will keep watching for male or female as they are doing nestorations for the next 2 weeks
I have a question for our rehabbers out there...What is the "right" thing to do? How am I to look at this with the "right" perspective? Just because a hawk or eagle is blind in an eye, or injured, doesnt mean its life has to end. So then, what about the eagle (now famous), who had his wing shot partially off, and surgery was done to amputate the wing. The eagle can no longer fly. But he is alive, and used as an educational eagle, and seems to enjoy his handler handling him and playing with him etc. Did they do the "right" thing? Or is a bird's design and drive to "fly" so great, that to keep it alive when it cannot fly - would be cruel?? I had selfishly always thought that as long as it was alive, reasonably, we did the right thing.
But with the rth at one of the now famous rehab facilities, a decision was made that with an injured wing, to amputate the wing would not be the moral or "right" thing to do, and he was euthanized. I was so sad to hear and read that news, as I just loved the little creature and it sure seemed peppy and joyful.
So I am wondering just how, should I be looking at this. When does it become the wrong thing to do? Does a raptor have a purpose within itself, for life, if it cannot fly? I question this because I always thought LIFE was the better choice. If I am not "looking" at this from the right perspective, I would like to know quite honestly, and directly, how to look at it. What is really best for the bird? and I not only mean with this bird, but example, even now we see videos of dogs w/o front legs, squirrels w/o legs, blind dogs, blind cats, and all have found a family that loves them and can care for them. Their life seems worthwhile and joyful. Is it the same for a bird who cannot fly? How do they draw the line and say "we cannot morally amputate a birds wing" ? I truly would like to know so I can feel I am looking at this from the humane, "right" perspective...
THANKS IN ADVANCE FOR ANY OF YOUR POSTS TO THIS ISSUE!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7079/a7079fd8521a54687918fbb284afbc85598233ff" alt="valscratch :valscratch:"